Middlesex County prices the market at a median of $815,478 with median rent of $3,099, producing a gross rent-to-price ratio of 4.56% and a cap rate of 2.96%. Run a standard 20% down financing model at 6.85% and the monthly mortgage alone hits $4,275, against estimated total expenses of $1,085 and rent of $3,099, leaving a cash-flow deficit of $2,261 per month and a cash-on-cash return of negative 14.47%. The appreciation score of 63 versus a cash-flow score of 38 tells you exactly what this market is: a capital-growth play, not an income play. Year-over-year price growth of 1.26% is modest in absolute terms, but that number sits on top of an $815,000 base, so each percentage point represents meaningful equity accumulation. The overall score of 46, ranking 624th out of 1,000 counties nationally and in the 17th percentile, confirms this is not a market where the math pencils on day one.
That profile suits one type of buyer almost exclusively: a well-capitalized appreciation investor who can absorb negative monthly carry while building equity in a supply-constrained metro. The affordability index of 33 and median household income of $121,304 mean the ownership market is stretched even for local high earners, which structurally supports rental demand from people who cannot buy. A cash-flow buyer should stop here, because there is no realistic path to positive cash-on-cash at current prices and rates without significant below-market acquisition or substantial value-add forcing rents well above the $3,099 median. A value-add operator might find opportunity in repositioning assets to push rents toward the upper end of the range, but the entry basis is so high that the margin for error is thin. If your underwriting model requires cash-flow breakeven within 12 months, Middlesex does not fit.
The monthly tax and insurance figure deserves attention in the carry calculation. At a 1.23% state-average effective property tax rate, annual taxes on an $815,478 asset run approximately $10,030, and insurance adds another $2,120, putting combined tax and insurance at roughly $1,013 per month. That is a meaningful line item against $3,099 in gross rent, consuming about a third of collected income before mortgage, maintenance, vacancy, or management. The 1.23% rate is flagged as normal relative to other states, so it is not an outlier cost the way Texas or Illinois property taxes can be, but at this price point the absolute dollar figure still demands its own line on your underwrite. Keep in mind this is a state-average estimate; actual rates at the county or township level may differ, and Massachusetts municipalities vary enough that a specific town's rate could shift this figure materially.
Looking at neighbors sharpens the decision. Suffolk County, which includes Boston proper, carries a higher median rent of $3,307 against a $747,013 median price, producing a rent-to-price ratio of 5.31%, meaningfully better than Middlesex's 4.56%. Norfolk County at $744,669 median with a 4.58% ratio and the same overall score of 46 offers slightly lower entry with comparable rent efficiency. Bristol County drops the entry point to $524,316 with a 4.66% ratio and an overall score of 49, and Worcester County is the most efficient of the group at a 5.23% rent-to-price ratio, $481,357 median price, and the highest overall score at 53. Middlesex is the most expensive market in this peer set and generates the lowest rent-to-price ratio, which means it has the weakest income-per-dollar-invested profile of any county shown here. The case for choosing Middlesex over Worcester or Bristol rests entirely on a belief that the Cambridge-Boston-Somerville employment core, the concentration of universities, and the long-term supply constraints of eastern Massachusetts will drive appreciation outcomes that compensate for the current income deficit. If your hold period is under five years or your equity reserves are limited, the numbers point toward Worcester or Bristol, where the ratio is better and the entry basis leaves more room for rate movements or rent softness.
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $611,609 | -$1,192/mo | 4.0% | -10.2% |
Median typical MLS deal | $815,478 | -$2,261/mo | 3.0% | -14.5% |
125% of median newer / premium | $1,019,348 | -$3,329/mo | 2.4% | -17.0% |
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Based on 4.56% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on 1.3% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Price-to-income ratio of 6.7x. Lower ratios indicate more affordable markets.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Middlesex County in Massachusetts scores 46/100, ranking #624 of 1,000 US counties (top 83%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $2261/month; the 4.56% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.
Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.