RentalCalcs
ToolsMarket MapMy DealsPricingBlog
RentalCalcs

Professional real estate investment calculators to help you analyze deals faster and make confident investment decisions.

Product

  • Tools
  • Market Map
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • About

Top Markets

  • Maricopa County, AZ
  • Harris County, TX
  • San Diego County, CA
  • Miami-Dade County, FL
  • Dallas County, TX
  • Clark County, NV
  • Cook County, IL
  • Tarrant County, TX
  • Wayne County, MI
  • Orange County, CA
  • Browse All Markets →

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

© 2026 RentalCalcs. All rights reserved.

Market MapArizonaMohave

Mohave County

ArizonaPopulation: 214,229
49
/100
Hold
#568 of 1,000 counties
#6 in Arizona (15 counties)
Analysis by RentalCalcs Research·Independent data + algorithm-driven scoring
Updated May 15, 2026Sources: Zillow ZHVI, Zillow ZORI, US Census ACS, Tax Foundation

Market Snapshot

$350,643
Median Home Price
50% above national median
$1,489/mo
Median Rent
1% below national median
5.10%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Top 71% nationally
-$870
Est. Monthly Cash Flow
With 20% down at 6.9% rate

Mohave market analysis

Mohave County sits at a 3.31% cap rate on a $350,643 median purchase price, with gross rent of $1,489 per month producing a rent-to-price ratio of 0.051. That puts it squarely in appreciation territory rather than cash-flow country. The model underwrite, at 6.85% interest on an 80% loan, produces a monthly mortgage of $1,838 against $1,489 in rent before any expenses, and the resulting cash-on-cash return of -12.95% confirms this is not a market where you buy at the median and clip coupons. Year-over-year price growth of 1.18% is modest, not the kind of appreciation that rescues negative carry quickly. The affordability index of 35 and median household income of $53,592 also tell you that organic rent-growth pressure is constrained by what local tenants can actually pay.

This market does not suit a cash-flow buyer who is financing at current rates. The numbers simply don't support it at median price points. It fits the appreciation buyer with a longer hold thesis, or, more realistically, the operator who can source below-market acquisitions, whether through distress, off-market relationships, or value-add repositioning, and close the gap between that -$870 monthly cash flow and breakeven. With a population of 214,229 and an affordability index of 35, there is a tenant base that cannot afford to own, which supports rental demand in principle, but capturing it profitably requires buying well below $350,000 or achieving rents above the $1,489 median. The appreciation score of 62 is the one bright spot, ranking relatively well within its peer set, but investors should pressure-test whether that reflects fundamental demand or prior-cycle momentum that has largely exhausted itself at 1.18% trailing growth.

The county's property tax burden is a genuine tailwind in the underwrite. Arizona's state-average effective rate runs 0.62%, flagged as low relative to national norms, which translates to $2,174 in annual taxes on the median asset. Combined with $806 in estimated annual insurance, the total tax-and-insurance carry is $248 per month. That is a materially lighter fixed cost than you'd face in Illinois, Texas, or New Jersey at comparable price points, and it explains roughly a third of why the gross cash-flow picture isn't worse. That said, this is a state-average estimate and actual Mohave County or township-level assessments may differ, so pull the specific parcel tax history before signing any purchase contract.

The primary risk here is concentration. Mohave County's largest population centers, Kingman, Lake Havasu City, and Bullhead City, are retirement and leisure-oriented markets with limited economic diversification. A county of 214,000 people with a $53,592 median income is not generating large-employer anchor demand of the kind that drives rental absorption in metro markets. Retiree in-migration has supported values historically, but that cohort is more likely to own than rent, and it is rate-sensitive as buyers, meaning the 1.18% price growth figure may be telling you that migration-driven appreciation has slowed. There is no vacancy data provided here, but thin economic diversification in a tertiary leisure market is a structural risk worth pricing into your underwriting assumptions rather than assuming it away.

Against its neighbors, Mohave is the weakest pure cash-flow option of the group. Navajo County at a 0.0604 rent-to-price ratio and Pinal County at 0.0609 both produce meaningfully better gross yields than Mohave's 0.051, and both carry overall scores of 49 and 50 respectively against Mohave's 49. Pima County, home to Tucson, is actually cheaper at $339,306 median with a 0.0534 ratio, offering modestly better yield plus the demand depth of a university and metro labor market. La Paz County scores a 55 overall, the strongest in this peer group, and at a $264,493 median price provides the lowest absolute capital commitment. The clearest case for choosing Mohave over these alternatives is if you have specific local knowledge, an off-market pipeline, or a value-add project in a Mohave submarket where you can buy at a discount large enough to close the yield gap. Buying at the median here, compared to Navajo or Pinal on raw yield metrics, requires a conviction on Mohave-specific appreciation or a deal-sourcing edge that the aggregate numbers don't yet justify.

Last analyzed May 15, 2026. Based on the latest available Zillow and Census data for Mohave County.

Scenario comparison

Same $1,489/mo rent assumption, 20% down, 6.85% rate. What changes is the acquisition price.
ScenarioPurchase priceMonthly cash flowCap rateCash-on-cash
75% of median
value-add or distressed
$262,982-$411/mo4.4%-8.2%
Median
typical MLS deal
$350,643-$870/mo3.3%-12.9%
125% of median
newer / premium
$438,304-$1,330/mo2.6%-15.8%

Price History

Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI

Quick Investment Calculator

20%
5%50%100%

Purchase

Purchase Price$350,643
Down Payment (20%)$70,129
Loan Amount$280,514
Interest Rate6.85%

Monthly Cash Flow

Gross Rent+$1,489
Monthly P&I-$1,838
Est. Expenses (35%)-$521
Net Cash Flow-$870/mo
3.3%
Cap Rate (all cash)
-12.9%
Cash-on-Cash Return
5.10%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Negative leverage: At 6.85% rates, borrowing costs exceed the 3.3% cap rate. All-cash buyers may see better returns.

* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.

Run Full AnalysisTry House Hack Strategy

Score Breakdown

Overall Investment Score
49/100
49
Cash Flow(30%)
46/100

Based on 5.10% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.

Appreciation(25%)
62/100

Based on 1.2% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.

Stability(25%)
50/100

Population data not available.

Affordability(20%)
35/100

Price-to-income ratio of 6.5x. Lower ratios indicate more affordable markets.

Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.

Investment Outlook

Strengths

  • +Complete rent data available

Challenges

  • -Below-average rent-to-price ratio (5.10%)
  • -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$870/mo)
  • -Negative leverage (cap rate 3.3% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
  • -High price-to-income ratio makes financing challenging

Economic Indicators

Population
214,229
Median Income
$53,592
vs $57,059 national est.
Unemployment Rate
—
Data pending
Price-to-Income
6.5x
Less affordable

Who this market fits

Best for
  • +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
Skip if
  • −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
  • −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
  • −You rely on FHA-style financing: prices are stretched relative to local incomes

Compare to Nearby Counties

CountyVerdict
La PazAZ
55$264,493Est. pending—HoldView
PinalAZ
50$364,073$1,8476.09%HoldView
CurrentMohaveAZ
49$350,643$1,4895.10%Hold
NavajoAZ
49$389,192$1,9586.04%HoldView
PimaAZ
46$339,306$1,5105.34%HoldView
GreenleeAZ
44$156,689Est. pending—AvoidView

The Bottom Line

HoldMohave is a neutral market. Consider house hacking or targeting below-market deals.

Mohave County in Arizona scores 49/100, ranking #568 of 1,000 US counties (top 75%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $870/month; the 5.10% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.

Monthly Cash Flow
$-870/mo
Cap Rate
3.3%
Cash-on-Cash
-12.9%

Related markets

Markets like Mohave with stronger cash flow

  • Pinal County for cash-flow rentals
  • Navajo County for cash-flow rentals
  • Pima County for cash-flow rentals

Cheaper alternatives to Mohave

  • Greenlee County, lower entry price
  • La Paz County, lower entry price
  • Pima County, lower entry price

Head-to-head comparisons

  • Mohave vs Navajo for rentals
  • Mohave vs Pinal for rentals
  • Mohave vs Pima for rentals
All counties in Arizona →

Frequently asked questions

The average cap rate in Mohave County is 3.31%, which is relatively low and indicates limited cash-flow potential for investors seeking immediate returns.

Ready to Analyze a Deal in Mohave?

Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.

Single Family1-4 unit rentals, BRRRRHouse HackOwner-occupied strategyMultifamily5+ unit properties
Explore Other Markets