Baltimore City lands in the 85th percentile nationally and 3rd in Maryland, and the headline number tells you why: a rent-to-price ratio of 0.1122, which translates to a 7.3% cap rate on a $184,592 median purchase price against $1,726 in monthly rent. At a 20% down payment of roughly $36,900, the model produces $155 in monthly cash flow after a $968 mortgage and $604 in estimated expenses, good for a 4.38% cash-on-cash return at a 6.85% note rate. Home prices are down 1.1% year-over-year, so this is not a market where you are buying for equity appreciation, at least not now. The appreciation score of 44 out of 100 confirms that. What Baltimore City is offering is yield, and a cash-flow score of 100 means it ranks at the top of the range for that metric.
The numbers point squarely at cash-flow buyers and value-add operators, not appreciation buyers. An investor whose model requires sub-1% rent-to-price ratios or 5-cap deals will not find them here, but an investor who needs the income to carry the asset from day one will. The median home price of $184,592 is a low enough entry point that even if a value-add renovation adds $20,000 to $30,000 in basis, the ratio still holds up. The affordability index of 83 and median household income of $58,349 indicate a renter pool that is real and sizable, a city of 584,548 people where homeownership is not the default path for much of the population. That structural renter demand is part of what keeps the rent-to-price ratio at a level most suburban Maryland markets cannot touch.
Monthly property taxes and insurance together run an estimated $200, using a state-average effective tax rate of 1.09% (Tax Foundation 2024). That figure is already baked into the $604 in estimated monthly expenses, so it is not a surprise, but it is worth examining independently. A 1.09% rate is in the normal range, neither a tailwind nor a burden relative to peer markets. What matters more in Baltimore City is that the actual city tax rate can diverge meaningfully from the state average, so any specific deal needs the real city rate on the underwrite, not the state estimate. The combined $200 monthly for taxes and insurance is reasonable relative to the rent, roughly 11.6 cents on every dollar of gross rent, which leaves enough room for the other expense categories to still produce positive cash flow.
The specific risks here are concentration and stability. A stability score of 50 out of 100 is the weakest dimension in the profile. Baltimore City is a single-municipality jurisdiction with population decline that has been persistent over decades, and a 584,548 population figure that continues to contract puts long-term demand assumptions under pressure. Investors should underwrite conservatively on vacancy and should be selective about neighborhood, because price and rent dispersion within the city is wide. A median number tells you the midpoint; it does not tell you that adjacent blocks can have entirely different demand profiles. The year-over-year price decline of 1.1% is modest, but it does signal that buying for appreciation in the near term is a speculative bet, not a baseline assumption.
Against its Maryland neighbors, Baltimore City's advantage is unambiguous on yield. Baltimore County, the surrounding jurisdiction, has a median home price of $352,651 against $1,729 in rent, a rent-to-price ratio of 0.0588, less than half of Baltimore City's 0.1122. You are paying nearly twice the price for nearly identical rent. Allegany County comes in cheaper at $148,598 with a 0.0762 ratio and an overall score of 75, but the rent floor of $943 is thin and the market is much smaller. Wicomico County at 0.0745 and Calvert County at 0.0644 are both in the same category as Baltimore County: appreciation-oriented or lifestyle markets with yield profiles that do not compete with Baltimore City. Choose Baltimore City over these neighbors when your primary objective is maximizing cash yield on a low entry price and you have the asset management capability to operate in a higher-complexity urban environment. Choose a neighbor when you want a simpler market, lower tenant turnover risk, or a more stable long-term appreciation trajectory, and you are willing to accept a materially lower rent-to-price ratio to get it.
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $138,444 | +$397/mo | 9.7% | +15.0% |
Median typical MLS deal | $184,592 | +$155/mo | 7.3% | +4.4% |
125% of median newer / premium | $230,740 | -$87/mo | 5.8% | -2.0% |
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Based on 11.22% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on -1.1% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Price-to-income ratio of 3.2x. Lower ratios indicate more affordable markets.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Baltimore City in Maryland scores 70/100, ranking #114 of 1,000 US counties (top 15%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental clears about $155/month in cash flow, backed by a 11.22% gross rent-to-price ratio.
Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.