Fayette County (Lexington) sits at a 3.54% cap rate and a gross rent-to-price ratio of 0.0545, which places it firmly in appreciation territory rather than cash-flow territory. At a 20% down payment of $65,769, the modeled monthly mortgage at 6.85% comes to $1,724 against median rent of $1,494, producing negative cash flow of roughly $753 per month before you even account for the $523 in estimated expenses already baked into that figure. The cash-on-cash return of negative 11.95% is not a rounding error; it is the structural reality of buying a $329,000 asset in a market where rents have not kept pace with prices. The offsetting argument is appreciation: home prices rose 2.59% year-over-year, and the appreciation score of 76 out of 100 is the highest single score in this market's profile, suggesting the market has historically rewarded holders on the price side even when the income side is thin.
This market is built for the appreciation-oriented buyer with a long hold horizon and the balance sheet to carry negative cash flow, not for the investor who needs the property to service itself from day one. A cash-flow buyer running a conventional 20%-down underwrite will be writing a check every month, and nothing in the numbers suggests that changes in the near term without a meaningful compression in purchase price or a material rent increase. A value-add operator could potentially close part of that gap by forcing rent above the $1,494 median, but the 3.54% cap rate suggests the market is pricing assets for appreciation, so finding distressed stock at a discount wide enough to generate positive carry will require patience and specificity. The stability score of 50 and cash-flow score of 52 both sit at or below the dataset midpoint, reinforcing that this is a conditional buy, not a broad market recommendation.
The $326 per month in combined property tax and insurance is meaningful context for the underwrite. Kentucky's state-average effective property tax rate of 0.86% is in the normal range and does not require a special flag, but the $2,828 in annual tax and $1,085 in annual insurance together represent real carry that tightens an already negative cash-flow position. Keep in mind this is a state-average estimate; actual Fayette County or township rates may differ, so pull the county assessor data before closing. On a percentage basis the combined tax-and-insurance load is not punishing by national standards, but at negative $753 per month in base cash flow, every line on the underwrite matters.
The 321,276-person population base in Lexington, anchored by a university and state-government employment concentration, provides the rental demand stability that keeps vacancy from becoming a crisis even when cash flow is negative. The affordability index of 55 and median household income of $66,087 indicate that a meaningful share of the population is priced toward renting rather than owning at current prices, which supports sustained rental demand even if it also limits how fast rents can grow. This is not a market where renters have outsized pricing power; the income base caps how aggressively landlords can push rents without turning over tenants.
The principal risk for a buy-and-hold investor here is duration. Negative cash flow at this scale requires either a refinancing event at materially lower rates, rent growth that outpaces price appreciation, or an exit at a meaningfully higher price to justify the carry cost. If rates stay near 6.85% and rent growth remains modest, the hold period to reach breakeven on a total-return basis lengthens significantly. Concentration risk is also worth naming: Lexington's economy is not broadly diversified across multiple large industries, so any structural shift in the university or government sector would flow through to rental demand faster than in a more diversified metro.
Compared to the neighboring counties in this dataset, Fayette's 0.0545 rent-to-price ratio is the highest of the group with full data, edging out Warren County (0.0518) and Oldham County (0.0507), and well above Madison County (0.0425). That means Fayette actually generates more rent per dollar of purchase price than its neighbors despite the higher absolute price, which is not intuitive but reflects that Lexington's rental market is deeper and more liquid than the surrounding counties. Madison County at a $277,000 median price still produces worse rent-to-price dynamics than Fayette, making it a worse choice on income fundamentals. Oldham County at $433,000 median and an overall score of 62 is the only neighbor that outscores Fayette overall, and it may suit an investor targeting higher-income renters. Choose Fayette over its neighbors when your thesis is appreciation and tenant depth in a mid-size city; choose McLean or Marshall when you need a lower entry price and are willing to accept less liquidity and thinner rental pools in exchange for a more manageable carry.
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $246,632 | -$322/mo | 4.7% | -6.8% |
Median typical MLS deal | $328,843 | -$753/mo | 3.5% | -11.9% |
125% of median newer / premium | $411,053 | -$1,184/mo | 2.8% | -15.0% |
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Based on 5.45% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on 2.6% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Price-to-income ratio of 5.0x. Lower ratios indicate more affordable markets.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Fayette County in Kentucky scores 58/100, ranking #383 of 1,000 US counties (top 51%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $753/month; the 5.45% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.
Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.